Labour
migration is a significant and dynamic phenomenon involving millions of workers
moving from one state to another, primarily in search of employment and better
economic opportunities. Inter-state labour migration involves over 40 million
workers moving primarily from less developed states to more industrialised
ones, driven chiefly by the search for better employment and income
opportunities amid socio-economic disparities across regions.
Extent of Inter-State Labour Migration in India
●
According
to Census 2011 data, the total number of inter-state migrant workers in India
was approximately 41.4 million (4,14,22,917 persons).
●
Inter-state
migration accounts for about 12% of total migration in India, while intra-state
migration constitutes about 88%.
●
The
migration streams show that states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan, and
Madhya Pradesh are major sources of out-migration, with millions moving to
economically developed states such as Maharashtra, Delhi, and Gujarat.
●
The
migration is mostly from economically underdeveloped states to more
industrialised and urbanised states, reflecting a pattern of labour movement
towards areas with better job prospects.
●
Certain
states like Tamil Nadu have a large inflow of inter-state migrant labour,
especially in industrial and urban centres such as Tirupur, Coimbatore, and
Chennai.
Inter-State Scenario
This
migration network highlights the predominant labour movement from economically
underdeveloped states in the north and east to industrialised and urbanised
states in the west and south, driven largely by employment opportunities in manufacturing,
construction, services, and informal sectors.
Uttar
Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and West Bengal are the primary
source states with the highest number of inter-state migrant workers, while
Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu are the leading
destination states attracting the largest inflows of migrant labour in India
States with the Highest Number of
Inter-State Migrant Workers (Origin States)
●
Uttar
Pradesh:
The largest source state, with about 31.56 million inter-state migrant workers
moving out for employment and other reasons.
●
Bihar: Another major source, contributing
around 7.06 million migrant workers to other states.
●
Rajasthan: Significant out-migration with
about 1.71 million inter-state migrants.
●
Madhya
Pradesh:
Also a key origin state, with approximately 2.42 million migrant workers
leaving the state.
●
West
Bengal: Noted for
a large number of migrants, with about 1.65 million workers migrating to other
states.
●
Odisha: Around 0.85 million migrants
originate from here.
●
Jharkhand: About 0.82 million migrants.
●
Assam
and Manipur:
Smaller but notable contributors to inter-state migration.
These states
are generally less economically developed and have higher poverty levels, which
push workers to migrate in search of better employment opportunities.
States with the Highest Number of
Inter-State Migrant Workers (Destination States)
●
Maharashtra: The top destination state,
receiving about 7.9 million inter-state migrant workers, including a large
influx from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
●
Delhi
(NCT of Delhi):
Receives about 2.03 million migrant workers, primarily from Uttar Pradesh and
Bihar.
●
Gujarat: Attracts over 3 million migrant
workers.
●
Karnataka: Receives around 2.88 million
migrants.
●
Tamil
Nadu: Another
major destination with about 3.48 million migrant workers.
●
Kerala: Attracts over 0.7 million
migrants, often from north-eastern and eastern states.
Key Migration Flows (State-to-State)
●
Uttar
Pradesh → Maharashtra:
The largest inter-state labour migration corridor, accounting for over 5.7% of
migrants moving for job-related reasons.
●
Uttar
Pradesh → Delhi:
Another major flow, with more than 4% of migrants moving for employment.
●
Bihar →
Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu: Bihar migrants move predominantly to these economically
advanced states.
●
Rajasthan
→ Maharashtra, Gujarat, Delhi: Rajasthan migrants also follow similar patterns.
●
West
Bengal → Maharashtra, Delhi, Tamil Nadu: Migrants from West Bengal move to these states for work.
●
Jharkhand
and Odisha → Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu: These eastern states contribute to
migrant labour in western and southern states.
Regional Patterns
●
Migration
is largely from northern and eastern states (Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand,
Odisha, West Bengal, and Rajasthan) to western and southern states
(Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Delhi).
●
The
flows are mostly driven by economic disparities, with migrants moving from
rural and less developed regions to urban and industrial hubs.
●
Migration
distances vary, but many migrants move to neighbouring or nearby states, though
some travel longer distances for better opportunities.
Summary
Map of Flows (Conceptual)
Net Suppliers |
Destination States (Net
Receivers) |
Uttar Pradesh |
Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat,
Karnataka, Tamil Nadu |
Bihar |
Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Tamil
Nadu |
Rajasthan |
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Delhi |
Madhya Pradesh |
Maharashtra, Gujarat |
West Bengal |
Maharashtra, Delhi, Tamil Nadu |
Jharkhand |
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu |
Odisha |
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu |
Assam |
Neighbouring states (e.g., West
Bengal, Meghalaya) |
Key
Migration Patterns
●
The
largest migration flow is from Uttar Pradesh to Maharashtra, accounting for
over 5.7% of migrants moving for job-related purposes between 2020 and 2021.
●
Uttar
Pradesh to Delhi migration is also significant, with over 4% moving for
employment.
●
The
major origin states are generally in the north and east, while the major
destination states are in the west and south, reflecting economic disparities
and industrial concentration.
The states in India that are the
highest receivers of migrant labour and those that are net suppliers (net
out-migrants) are well-documented based on Census 2011 and subsequent
government data.
Additional Notes
●
Uttar
Pradesh and Bihar alone account for about half of the total inter-state
out-migrants in India.
●
Maharashtra
and Delhi together attract the largest share of migrants due to their
industrial growth and urban job opportunities.
●
Other
states like Gujarat and Tamil Nadu attract migrants even from distant states,
reflecting their economic magnetism.
●
The
government’s Garib Kalyan Rozgar Abhiyan targeted employment generation in
high out-migration states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan,
Jharkhand, and Odisha to reduce distress migration
Prime Reasons for Labour Migration
A
combination of push and pull factors drives labour migration in India:
Push
Factors (Reasons compelling people to leave their native places)
● Lack of suitable employment
opportunities or underemployment in the home state.
●
Poverty,
inequality, and high population density in source states.
●
Seasonal
unemployment due to agricultural cycles and low agricultural productivity.
●
Social
factors such as landlessness, lower caste status, and economic disadvantages
that limit local livelihood options.
● Poor living conditions and lack of
social infrastructure in rural areas.
Pull Factors (Attractions to
destination states)
● Availability of better and more
consistent employment opportunities in destination states.
●
Higher
wages and better income prospects compared to home states.
●
Industrial
growth and urbanization in certain states creating demand for labour in
construction, manufacturing, and services sectors.
● Migration for education and business
opportunities, though these are smaller components compared to
employment-driven migration.
Additional Observations
● Employment-related reasons
constitute around 25% of inter-state migration, with a higher proportion among
males (46%) compared to females (6%).
●
Marriage
and moving with households also contribute significantly to migration,
especially among females.
●
Migration
is often a survival strategy for poor and marginalised communities, sometimes
resulting in cyclical or seasonal migration patterns.
● Reverse migration has been observed
during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the vulnerabilities of
migrant workers in destination states.
How do socio-economic factors
influence inter-state migration in India?
Socio-economic factors play a
crucial role in shaping the patterns and volume of inter-state migration in
India. These factors influence both the decision to migrate and the choice of
destination, reflecting disparities in development, employment opportunities,
and social conditions across states.
Socio-economic
factors influence inter-state migration in India through a complex interplay of
regional economic disparities, employment opportunities, social development,
and urbanization. Migration flows predominantly move from poorer, less
developed states to richer, more urbanized states, driven by the search for
better livelihoods and living conditions. Social factors such as education and
marriage also play important roles, while the vulnerabilities faced by migrants
in destination states underscore the need for inclusive policies
1. Regional Economic Disparities and
Development Levels
●
Migration
is strongly linked to regional disparities in economic development. People tend
to move from less developed, poorer states with limited employment
opportunities to more economically advanced states with better job prospects,
especially in urban and industrial centers1.
●
States
with higher economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization such as
Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, and Punjab attract large numbers of
migrants from poorer states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and Odisha12.
●
The
availability of jobs in secondary (manufacturing) and tertiary (service)
sectors in destination states acts as a pull factor, while underdevelopment,
poverty, and lack of employment in source states act as push factors12.
2. Income and Employment
Opportunities
●
Low
wages, unemployment, and underemployment in rural and agricultural areas push
workers to migrate to states offering higher wages and more stable employment,
often in construction, manufacturing, and services15.
●
Economic
growth driven by service sector expansion also influences migration by creating
new livelihood opportunities that attract migrants2.
●
Migration
is often a survival strategy for economically marginalized populations who seek
to improve their income and living standards15.
3. Social Factors and Human Capital
●
Social
development indicators such as education, health, and welfare policies
influence migration patterns. Higher social expenditure and better education
levels in some states can lead to increased out-migration as families invest in
education and skills, enabling young people to seek jobs elsewhere2.
●
Marriage
is a significant social reason for migration, especially among females,
contributing to intra- and inter-state migration34.
●
Social
inequalities, caste-based disadvantages, and landlessness in source states also
compel migration as people seek better social and economic opportunities
elsewhere1.
4. Urbanization and Infrastructure
●
Urban
centres, administrative headquarters, and business hubs attract migrants due to
better infrastructure, services, and employment opportunities1.
●
States
with better road connectivity and irrigation facilities can influence migration
patterns by improving agricultural productivity and incomes, which may either
reduce or enable migration depending on the context2.
5. Vulnerability and Living
Conditions
●
Migrants
often face poor living conditions, low wages (sometimes about 70% of local
wages), long working hours, and inadequate sanitation in destination states,
which can affect their decisions to migrate or return home (reverse migration)5.
●
The
COVID-19 pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities of migrant workers, highlighting
the socio-economic challenges they face in destination states2.
What are the main industries
attracting migrant workers to Maharashtra and Delhi?
The main industries attracting
migrant workers to Maharashtra and Delhi reflect the economic structure and
demand for labour in these states, particularly in sectors requiring both
skilled and unskilled workers.
Maharashtra: Key Industries Attracting Migrant Workers
●
Automobile
and Auto Components: Maharashtra is a major automobile manufacturing hub with
factories of Tata Motors, Mahindra & Mahindra, Bajaj Auto, and a thriving
auto parts industry. This sector offers numerous jobs for skilled and
semi-skilled workers1.
●
Pharmaceuticals
and Chemicals: Mumbai and other parts of Maharashtra are important centres for
pharmaceutical and chemical industries, providing employment opportunities in
manufacturing and related activities1.
●
Textiles
and Apparel: The state has a historic and large textile industry, especially in
Mumbai and surrounding areas, producing cotton and synthetic fabrics that employ
many migrant workers16.
●
Engineering
and Electronics: Maharashtra hosts numerous engineering firms producing heavy
equipment and electronic apparatus, which attract skilled labourers1.
●
Construction:
A significant share of migrants in Maharashtra work in the construction sector,
including infrastructure development, housing, and urban projects23.
●
Other
sectors: Metal and woodwork, handicrafts, and personal services also employ
migrant workers in Maharashtra2.
Delhi: Main Industries Employing Migrant
Workers
●
Construction:
The largest employer of migrant labour in Delhi, involving masons, labourers,
painters, plumbers, and other skilled and unskilled workers engaged in building
infrastructure and housing45.
●
Domestic
Work and Household Services: A substantial proportion of migrants, especially
women, work as domestic helpers, cooks, cleaners, and caretakers in private
households45.
●
Manufacturing
and Small-Scale Industries: Migrants are engaged in manufacturing activities,
including garments, handicrafts, and small workshops4.
●
Trade,
Retail, and Services: Many migrants work in retail shops, food joints,
hospitality, and other service sectors that support the urban economy45.
●
Security
and Maintenance: Jobs such as watchmen, security guards, gardeners, and
cleaners employ a significant number of migrants4.
●
Other
skilled trades: Craftsmen including motor mechanics, carpenters, electricians,
welders, tailors, and plumbers form a notable segment of migrant workers in
Delhi4.
Main Challenges faced by the Migrant
Workers
Inter-state migrant workers in India
face a wide range of challenges rooted in their socio-economic vulnerabilities,
legal status, and living and working conditions. These challenges affect their
dignity, security, health, and ability to integrate socially and economically
in destination states.
Main
Challenges Faced by Inter-State Migrant Workers in India
Inter-state migrant workers in India
confront multiple interlinked challenges: insecure and exploitative employment,
social exclusion and language barriers, lack of legal protections, poor living
conditions, and limited access to education and healthcare, identity and
documentation issues, financial precarity, and psychological stress. These
challenges are exacerbated by inadequate policy implementation and coordination
across states, leaving migrants vulnerable despite their crucial role in the
economy.
1.
Lack of Job Security and Exploitation
●
Most
migrant workers are employed in the informal and unorganized sectors, often
through contractors or middlemen, with no formal contracts or job security.
●
They
face low wages, delayed or withheld payments, forced long working hours, and
unsafe working conditions.
●
Exploitation
by labour contractors is common, who charge high fees and impose harsh terms,
trapping workers in precarious jobs27.
2. Social Exclusion and Language
Barriers
●
Migrants
often face discrimination and social exclusion due to differences in language,
culture, ethnicity, and regional identity.
●
Language
barriers hinder communication with employers, local authorities, and access to
government services, sometimes leading to suspicion, harassment, or wrongful
detention by police16.
●
Difficulty
in social integration leads to isolation and vulnerability.
3. Lack of Legal Protection and
Access to Rights
●
Migrant
workers frequently lack awareness of their legal rights and have limited access
to justice when rights are violated.
●
Many
are not covered adequately by labour laws or social security schemes due to the
informal nature of their employment and lack of documentation.
●
The
absence of a centralized registry or data on migrants complicates policy
implementation and welfare delivery25.
4. Inadequate and Poor Living
Conditions
●
Migrants
often live in overcrowded, unhygienic, and unsafe housing arrangements, such as
construction site sheds or slums, with limited access to sanitation and clean
water.
●
Such
conditions increase their vulnerability to diseases and health hazards, as
starkly highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic258.
5. Challenges in Accessing Education
and Health Services
●
Migrant
children face difficulties enrolling and continuing education due to language
differences, frequent relocations, and discrimination, leading to high dropout
rates.
●
Migrants
have poor access to healthcare and social welfare services in destination
states, partly due to lack of local identity proofs and portability of benefits27.
6. Identity, Documentation, and
Portability Issues
●
Many
migrants lack verifiable identity documents such as voter ID or ration cards,
making them vulnerable to harassment and exclusion from public services.
●
Portability
of social security benefits like the Public Distribution System (PDS) is
limited, though schemes like ‘One Nation, One Ration Card’ aim to address this.
●
The
lack of political inclusion, such as inability to vote in destination states,
further marginalizes migrants5.
7. Financial Vulnerability
●
Migrants
often survive on meagre earnings and send remittances home, but lack access to
formal financial services and government assistance.
●
Many
are not enumerated in government databases, limiting their access to direct
benefit transfers and welfare schemes5.
8. Psychological and Cultural
Challenges
●
Migrants
face alienation due to cultural differences, regionalism, and xenophobia in
host states.
●
They
experience stress, insecurity, and social isolation, which affect their mental
well-being.
How has the Covid-19 pandemic
changed the patterns of inter-state migration?
The COVID-19 pandemic caused a
massive and sudden reverse migration from urban to rural areas in India,
disrupting traditional inter-state labour flows. Post-pandemic, migration
patterns have evolved with increased emphasis on family proximity, lifestyle, and
remote work possibilities, alongside a gradual resumption of employment-driven
migration. These changes have lasting implications for urban-rural
demographics, labour markets, and policy frameworks addressing migrant welfare
and mobility.
Changes in Inter-State Migration
Patterns Due to COVID-19
1. Large-Scale Reverse Migration
●
The
nationwide lockdown in March 2020 led to sudden job losses and closure of
industries in urban centers, forcing millions of migrant workers to return to
their native rural areas.
●
This
reverse migration was unprecedented in scale, with about 87% of migrants
returning to their home states during the first and second lockdowns,
disrupting the usual rural-to-urban migration flow2467.
●
Migrants
faced hardships such as lack of transport, food, shelter, and health facilities
during this exodus.
2. Disruption of Mobility and
Employment
●
COVID-related
restrictions severely limited the mobility of migrants, halting regular
migration flows and stranding many workers outside their home or work states.
●
Many
industries dependent on migrant labour, such as construction, manufacturing,
and services, faced labour shortages after the reverse migration.
●
Migrants
lost access to social security and welfare benefits in destination states due
to their mobility and lack of documentation278.
3. Shift in Migration Motivations and
Patterns Post-Pandemic
●
While
rural-to-urban migration has resumed post-lockdown, the pandemic has influenced
migrants' reasons for moving.
●
There
is a growing trend of migration motivated by family proximity, lifestyle
choices, and the ability to work remotely rather than solely for employment35.
●
Remote
work capabilities have allowed some migrants, especially those in higher-income
and remote-work-capable occupations, to relocate to suburban or rural areas
without changing jobs, reducing the necessity to live in urban cores5.
4. Persistence of
Pandemic-Influenced Migration Decisions
●
Even
after the easing of restrictions and vaccine availability, pandemic-related
factors continue to influence migration decisions.
●
Around
9-15% of movers report that the pandemic influenced their decision to move,
with family reasons, remote work, and job loss being the top cited factors5.
5. Impact on Urban-Rural Dynamics
and Local Economies
●
The
"donut effect" has been observed, where population declines in urban
cores are accompanied by increases in suburban and rural areas.
●
These
shifts affect local economies, with areas experiencing migration inflows
showing higher post-pandemic economic growth indicators such as employment and
income5.
6. Health and Policy Implications
●
Reverse
migration contributed to the spread of COVID-19 in rural areas, complicating
containment efforts6.
●
The
crisis exposed the vulnerabilities of migrant workers, highlighting the need
for better social protection, data systems, and coordinated policy responses to
manage migration flows and welfare.
The problem of inter-state labour
migration in India is multifaceted, involving socio-economic, cultural, legal,
and policy-related challenges that affect millions of migrant workers who move
across state boundaries in search of better livelihood opportunities.
What are the probable solutions for
reducing the inter-state labour migration in India?
The problem of inter-state labour
migration in India can be addressed through a combination of policy measures,
welfare schemes, skill development, and institutional coordination aimed at
reducing distress migration and improving migrant workers’ conditions. The
probable solutions include:
1. Skill Development and Job
Creation in Source Areas
●
Investing
in rural skill development initiatives to enhance employability and create
local job opportunities can reduce the compulsion to migrate for work.
●
Schemes
like Skill India Mission and Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY)
empower workers with certified skills, increasing their chances of local
employment or better wages if they migrate.
●
Developing
agro-industrial hubs, rural livelihood zones, and promoting self-help groups
under schemes like MGNREGA and Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana (DAY-NRLM)
can generate sustainable employment in source regions, reducing distress
migration145.
2. Development of Counter-Magnet
Cities and Balanced Regional Growth
●
Promoting
regional cities as economic and social hubs by improving infrastructure,
affordable housing, healthcare, education, and employment opportunities can
disperse population growth and reduce pressure on major urban centres.
●
This
balanced regional development encourages migrants to move to closer, smaller
cities rather than distant metros, easing migration burdens and urban
congestion1.
3.
Strengthening Social Security and Welfare Portability
●
Implementation
and expansion of schemes like One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC) ensure food
security for migrants across states.
●
Developing
a nationwide platform for portability of social security benefits such as EPF,
ESIC, health insurance (e.g., PMJAY), and linking these with migrant databases
like the
e-Shram Portal can ensure seamless access to entitlements regardless of
location47.
4. Affordable Housing and Livelihood
Clusters
●
Creating
affordable rental housing complexes (ARHC) near industrial and urban hubs
integrated with livelihood clusters can improve living conditions and reduce
travel costs for migrants.
●
Linking
housing schemes with urban development missions (e.g., Smart Cities Mission)
and employment programs (e.g., Make in India) can provide better quality of
life and job proximity4.
5. Institutional Coordination and
Policy Harmonization
●
Encouraging
state governments to harmonize labour laws and welfare policies through a
national framework can improve coordination between source and destination
states.
●
Revamping
the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act (1979) and establishing State Coordination
Cells and District Facilitation Centres can enhance tracking, grievance
redressal, and welfare delivery.
●
MoUs
between states to protect migrant rights and facilitate safe migration are
essential345.
6. Digitization and Data-Driven
Interventions
●
Developing
migrant-friendly mobile applications and digital platforms for registration,
grievance redressal, and welfare delivery can improve transparency and
accessibility.
●
Computerizing
migrant data at the grassroots level helps in tracking movements and linking
workers to government schemes345.
7. Gender-Sensitive Policies and
Safety Measures
●
Designing
targeted interventions for female migrants including workplace safety, wage
parity, childcare facilities (e.g., integrating Anganwadi services), and health
care access can improve female labour participation and welfare4.
8. Healthcare Inclusion and
Occupational Safety
●
Introducing
mobile health clinics, occupational health programs, and linking health
insurance schemes with employers can reduce health risks and improve
productivity among migrant workers.
●
Preventive
care and workplace safety measures are crucial in hazardous sectors like
construction and mining46.
How can skill development programs
effectively reduce interstate migration?
Skill development programs can
effectively reduce inter-state migration in India by enhancing the
employability of workers in their home regions, thereby addressing the primary
push factors of migration—lack of local employment and low incomes. Here’s how
skill development contributes to reducing migration:
1. Creating Local Employment
Opportunities
●
By
equipping workers with relevant vocational and technical skills aligned to
local and regional economic needs, skill development programs enable them to
find gainful employment within their home states or nearby areas, reducing the
compulsion to migrate to distant states for work12.
●
Developing
skills in sectors with growth potential in source regions (e.g.,
agro-processing, small-scale industries, rural enterprises) helps generate
sustainable livelihoods locally.
2. Enhancing Labour Market Matching
and Mobility
●
Skill
development aligned with labour market demands improves the quality and
productivity of the workforce, making workers more competitive and employable
in local industries and services34.
●
When
combined with skills recognition and certification, workers can access better
jobs and wages without needing to migrate far, or they can migrate with better
prospects and protections if they choose.
3. Reducing Forced or Distress
Migration
●
Many
migrants move due to distress caused by unemployment or underemployment. Skill
training provides alternative livelihood options and income-generating
activities, reducing forced migration driven by poverty and lack of
opportunities1.
●
Skill
development also helps diversify income sources, including self-employment and
entrepreneurship, which can stabilise rural economies.
4. Facilitating Circular and
Temporary Migration
●
Well-designed
skill programs enable workers to engage in circular migration—moving
temporarily for work while maintaining strong ties to their home
communities—thus reducing permanent out-migration and its social costs3.
●
This
flexibility supports both the needs of destination labour markets and the
welfare of migrants.
5. Promoting Partnerships and
Multi-Stakeholder Involvement
●
International
and inter-state skill mobility partnerships involving governments, private
sector, and civil society ensure training is demand-driven and sustainable,
increasing the chances that trained workers find suitable employment locally or
in nearby regions35.
●
Such
partnerships can also facilitate knowledge exchange and improve training
quality.
6. Supporting Women and Vulnerable
Groups
●
Targeted
skill development for women and marginalized groups enhances their
participation in local economies, reducing migration driven by lack of opportunities
and social exclusion7.
●
Empowering
these groups locally improves community resilience and reduces migration
pressures.
How can state governments improve
the welfare of dependent populations to reduce out-migration?
State governments can improve the welfare of dependent
populations to reduce out-migration by adopting a range of social, economic,
and policy measures aimed at enhancing local living conditions, income
security, and access to essential services. Key approaches include:
1.
Increasing Social Expenditure and Welfare Support
●
Higher
social expenditure on health, education, nutrition, and social security
improves the welfare of dependent populations (children, elderly, women), which
can reduce the economic pressure on working-age members to migrate for
livelihood2.
●
Investments
in irrigation and agriculture productivity raise rural incomes, enabling
families to sustain themselves locally and invest in human capital, thereby
reducing distress migration2.
2. Enhancing Access to Basic
Services and Infrastructure
●
Improving
rural infrastructure such as roads, schools, healthcare facilities, and
sanitation raises quality of life and employment opportunities, making staying
in home states more viable.
●
States
like Kerala have implemented migrant-friendly policies including alternative
identity cards and access to education and healthcare, which support both
migrants and their families, reducing forced migration3.
3. Providing Affordable Housing and
Livelihood Support
●
Schemes
that provide affordable housing and support for local livelihoods (e.g.,
self-help groups, rural employment programs like MGNREGA) help stabilize
dependent populations and reduce the need for family members to migrate for
work3.
4. Facilitating Portability of
Welfare Benefits
●
Ensuring
portability of social security and welfare benefits such as ration cards,
health insurance, and pensions across states reduces the vulnerability of
migrants and their families, encouraging them to maintain ties with their home
states rather than permanently relocating13.
5. Fiscal Transfers and
Developmental Policies
●
Progressive
fiscal transfers from the central government to less-developed states can
reduce regional disparities by funding social welfare and development projects,
thus lowering the push factors for migration68.
●
Developmental
fiscal policies focused on local job creation and social protection can reduce
the pressure on working populations to migrate.
6. Policy Coordination and Inclusive
Governance
●
States
need to harmonize policies to protect migrant rights and welfare, including
political inclusion and non-discriminatory access to housing and services, to
reduce social exclusion and economic insecurity of dependent populations3.
●
Establishing
institutional mechanisms for migrant welfare and grievance redressal can also
improve conditions for dependents.
Scenario
of Labour Migration in West Bengal
West Bengal
has historically been both a source and destination of migrant labour, but with
a rising trend of out-migration driven mainly by employment needs. The state
ranks high among Indian states for outbound labour migration, with major flows
directed towards Maharashtra, Delhi, and other industrialised states. Migration
patterns have shifted over time from family and marriage-related moves to
predominantly employment-driven migration, especially among males. Despite some
in-migration, West Bengal remains a net supplier of migrant labour, reflecting
ongoing regional economic challenges.
The labour
migration scenario of West Bengal has evolved over time, reflecting changing
socio-economic dynamics and regional development patterns.
Past Scenario of Labour Migration in
West Bengal
● According to Census data, the total
number of migrants in West Bengal increased from about 17.87 million in 1991 to
25.1 million in 2001, and further to 33.45 million by 2011, indicating a steady
rise in migration over two decades1.
●
Historically,
migration in West Bengal involved both intra-state and inter-state flows, with
a significant share moving with family members, especially females, where
marriage and family relocation were dominant reasons.
●
In
1991, for males, employment was the third most important reason for migration,
but by 2001 it became the foremost reason, reflecting a shift towards
economic-driven migration2.
●
Natural
calamities also contributed to migration, alongside family reasons and
marriage.
● Out-migration for employment was
significant, with West Bengal ranking fourth among Indian states for outbound
migration for work between 2001 and 2011, after Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and
Rajasthan3.
Present
Scenario of Labour Out-Migration and In-Migration
● By 2011, about 5.8 lakh people
migrated out of West Bengal seeking employment, with migration occurring almost
equally from rural and urban areas3.
●
Major
destinations for migrant workers from West Bengal include Maharashtra and Delhi,
which attract nearly 45.3% and 34% respectively of Bengal’s outbound migrants
for work. Other important destinations are Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Andhra
Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh3.
●
The
outbound migration is largely among unskilled labourers from various districts
of West Bengal, indicating economic push factors such as lack of local
employment opportunities.
●
In
terms of in-migration, West Bengal also attracts migrants from other states,
though in smaller numbers compared to its out-migration. The state’s industrial
and urban centres draw workers, but the net migration balance is negative due
to higher outflows1.
● Migration reasons have diversified
with employment becoming a dominant factor for males, while females primarily
migrate due to family reasons and marriage2.
How has the trend of labour
out-migration in West Bengal changed over the past decade?
Over the past decade, the trend of
labour out-migration in West Bengal has shifted notably, reflecting both an
increase in the volume of migrants and a reversal in the state’s migration
balance.
Key
Changes in Labour Out-Migration from West Bengal
1.
Rising Volume of Migrants
● The total number of migrants in West
Bengal rose significantly, reaching 33.45 million (3.34 crore) by the 2011
Census, up from 25.1 million in 2001 and 17.87 million in 199112.
●
Of
these, 2.41 million (24.1 lakh) were classified as out-migrants—people who left
West Bengal for other states—according to the 2011 Census2.
2. Shift from Net In-Migration to
Net Out-Migration
● Historically, West Bengal received
more migrants than it sent out. In 1991 and 2001, the state had a surplus of
in-migrants (86,500 in 1991 and 76,900 in 2001)2.
●
By
2011, this trend reversed: West Bengal experienced a net migration loss, with
more people leaving the state than arriving, resulting in a net out-migration
of about 25,0002.
●
This
marks a significant change, positioning West Bengal as a net supplier of labour
to other states in the last decade.
3. Employment-Driven Out-Migration
● West Bengal now ranks fourth among
Indian states in terms of outbound migration for employment, after Uttar
Pradesh, Bihar, and Rajasthan3.
●
The
majority of out-migrants are unskilled or semi-skilled labourers seeking better
work opportunities in states like Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu3.
●
The
shift towards employment-driven migration is particularly pronounced among
males, while family and marriage remain key reasons for female migration2.
4. Spatial Patterns
● Out-migration is observed from both
rural and urban areas of West Bengal, indicating widespread economic push
factors2.
●
Certain
districts, such as North 24 Parganas, have higher migration rates, while others
like Maldah and Purulia have lower rates of inter-state out-migration2.
Year |
Total
Migrants in West Bengal |
Out-Migrants
(to other states) |
Net
Migration Balance |
1991 |
17.87 million |
— |
Net in-migration |
2001 |
25.10 million |
— |
Net in-migration |
2011 |
33.45 million |
2.41 million |
Net out-migration |
What
are the main reasons behind labour in-migration in West Bengal?
The main reasons behind labour
in-migration to West Bengal are shaped by the state’s unique socio-economic and
demographic dynamics, as well as its historical and regional context.
Main Reasons for Labour In-Migration
in West Bengal
1. Economic Opportunities and Wage
Differentials
● Urban and Industrial Growth: West
Bengal, particularly Kolkata and other urban centres, has long been a hub for
trade, services, and industry, attracting migrants seeking jobs in
construction, manufacturing, transport, and informal sectors4.
●
Wage
Differentials: For certain periods and sectors, wage rates in West
Bengal—especially in urban and peri-urban areas—have been higher than those in neighbouring
states or regions, making it an attractive destination for unskilled and
semi-skilled workers6.
●
Labour
Demand in Agriculture: The state’s intensive agriculture, especially in the
rice-producing belt, creates seasonal demand for labour, drawing in migrants
from less developed districts within West Bengal as well as from neighbouring
states64.
2.
Proximity and Social Networks
● Geographical Proximity: Migrants
from neighbouring states such as Bihar, Jharkhand, and Odisha often move to
West Bengal due to ease of access, cultural similarities, and established
migration corridors4.
●
Existing
Social Networks: Established communities of earlier migrants help new arrivals
find jobs and accommodation, lowering the barriers to migration and
facilitating continuous inflow4.
3.
Political and Historical Factors
● Historical Role as a
Migrant-Receiving State: Since the late nineteenth century, West Bengal has
been a major recipient of migrants, including refugees and labourers, due to
its economic prominence and political stability relative to some neighbouring
regions14.
●
Partition
and Displacement: Past events like the Partition of Bengal and subsequent political
changes have contributed to large-scale in-migration, shaping the state’s
demographic profile4.
4.
Lack of Opportunities in Source Regions
● Poverty and Unemployment in Neighbouring
States: Migrants from economically weaker regions are pushed to West Bengal due
to lack of regular employment, low agricultural productivity, and poor wage
rates at home46.
5.
Seasonal and Circular Migration
● Seasonal Labour Demand: During peak
agricultural seasons or periods of high construction activity, there is an
influx of short-term or circular migrants who return home after the season ends46.
Summary Table: Main Drivers of
Labour In-Migration to West Bengal
Reason |
Description |
Economic opportunities |
Jobs in urban/industrial sectors, higher wages in some
sectors and periods |
Agricultural labour demand |
Seasonal work in rice and other intensive agriculture |
Proximity and social networks |
Ease of access from neighbouring states, established
migrant communities |
Historical and political context |
Legacy of being a migrant-receiving state, past
displacement events |
Poverty in source regions |
Lack of jobs and low wages in Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha,
and other neighbouring states |
Seasonal/circular migration |
Temporary influx for agricultural or construction work |
What impact does labour migration
have on the local economy in West Bengal?
Labour migration—both in-migration
and out-migration—has had a significant and complex impact on the local economy
of West Bengal.
Positive Impacts
● Filling Labour Gaps in Key Sectors:
In-migration, especially from less-developed districts and neighbouring states,
helps meet the seasonal and sectoral demand for unskilled and semi-skilled
labour in agriculture, construction, and informal industries. For example,
migrants from Purulia and Murshidabad move to agriculturally advanced districts
like Bardhaman during peak seasons, enabling surplus production and supporting
the local economy1.
●
Supporting
Informal and Service Sectors: In-migrants are widely employed as contractual
labourers in informal and service sectors, contributing to urban growth and the
functioning of Kolkata and other cities3.
●
Economic
Mobility for Migrants: Migration offers a route out of poverty for many, as
migrants can earn higher incomes compared to their home regions. This income is
often remitted back, supporting families and local consumption18.
Negative
and Mixed Impacts
● Labour Rights and Vulnerability:
While migration brings higher income, it often comes at the cost of job
insecurity, lack of formal contracts, and poor working conditions. Migrants in
West Bengal, especially those in the informal sector, frequently lack social
protection and face exploitation1.
●
Pressure
on Local Resources: Large-scale in-migration can strain urban infrastructure,
public services, and housing, particularly in Kolkata and other urban centers.
●
Wage
and Employment Competition: The influx of migrant labour may increase
competition for low-skilled jobs, potentially depressing wages for local
workers or creating social tensions during periods of economic stress3.
●
Changing
Labour Relations: In agriculture, circular migration patterns can create labour
shortages in the migrants' home districts during peak times, sometimes
pressuring employers to improve contract terms1.
Broader
Socio-Economic Effects
● Remittance Economy: Out-migration
from West Bengal leads to remittance inflows, which improve household welfare,
increase local spending, and can contribute to rural development8.
●
Skill
Circulation: West Bengal is both a sender of skilled professionals (to other
Indian cities and abroad) and a receiver of unskilled labour, reflecting a dual
migration pattern that shapes the local workforce and economic structure1.
●
Social
and Cultural Change: Migration brings diversity and can foster new skills and
entrepreneurial activities, but may also introduce challenges related to
integration and social cohesion.
Summary
Labour migration in West Bengal supports economic growth by filling labour
shortages and boosting incomes, but also introduces challenges related to
worker vulnerability, resource pressure, and labour market competition. The net
effect is a dynamic local economy, shaped by both the opportunities and
constraints of migration flows.
No comments:
Post a Comment